By Sanjeev Miglani
NEW DELHI (Reuters) -A top U.N. human rights official has deplored the death in custody of an 84-year-old Indian Christian priest who campaigned for the rights of tribal people and was denied bail after being detained under an anti-terrorism law.
Father Stan Swamy was arrested last year on suspicion, which he denied, of ties to a banned radical leftist group that police accused of having instigated violence in Maharashtra state in 2018.
His death will revive criticism of the increasing use of the anti-terrorism statute under nationalist Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s government. Opponents of the law say it is used to hound people critical of the government.
Swamy, who suffered from Parkinson’s disease and also contracted COVID-19 while in prison, died in a Mumbai hospital on Monday. More than a dozen people gathered outside the St. Peter’s Church in Mumbai, where his funeral service was being held, to protest over his death.
“The news from India today is devastating. Human Rights Defender & Jesuit priest Fr Stan Swamy has died in custody, nine months after his arrest on false charges of terrorism,” said the U.N. special rapporteur for human rights defenders, Mary Lawlor.
“Jailing HRDs is inexcusable,” she added in a Twitter post, referring to human rights defenders.India’s foreign ministry late on Tuesday Swamy’s bail applications were rejected by courts “because of the specific nature of charges against him”.
It said India had an independent judiciary, a range of national and state level human rights commissions that monitor violations, a free media and a vibrant and vocal civil society.
“India remains committed to promotion and protection of human rights of all its citizens,” foreign ministry spokesperson Arindam Bagchi said.
At a briefing in Geneva, U.N. human rights commission spokeswoman Liz Throssell said the agency had repeatedly urged India’s government to protect a robust civil society. “We are very concerned with the way he was treated,” she said, calling for the release of people detained without proper legal basis.
India’s National Investigation Agency, which was pursuing the case against Swamy, did not respond to requests for comment.
In previous court hearings, the government denied accusations of mistreatment of Swamy, and said the law must be allowed to take its course.
Supporters of Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party said there could be no tolerance of violence by Maoist guerrillas, some of whom operate in remote areas where tribal people live.
Swamy was the oldest of a dozen people, most of them academics and human rights activists, accused of violence in 2018 and imprisoned under the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, which allows for prolonged detention for questioning.
“The government should have done something earlier…They took too long and didn’t do anything for (Swamy),” said Karen D’mello, a former local government official present at the Mumbai protest. “I don’t think he needed to be in (prison) first of all, he was wrongly accused.”
Swamy denied links to outlawed groups and repeatedly asked for bail, recently telling court in a video conference that his health had worsened in prison and he would soon die.
He had said he had difficulty eating and drinking because of his Parkinson’s and asked the court to allow him to use a straw and sipper. The court had agreed after nearly three weeks.
(Reporting by Sanjeev Miglani with additional reporting by C.K. Nayak, Francis Mascarenhas in Mumbai and Stephanie Nebehay-Ulmer in GenevaEditing by Mark Heinrich)